Institute of Medical Psychology
print


Breadcrumb Navigation


Content

Charissa de Bekker, PhD.

Humboldt Stipend

Responsibilities

Fungal Manipulation of Animal Behaviour

Parasites and their hosts are in an ever-ongoing battle with each other to get the upper hand in their interactions, and have often been doing so already for millions of years. Such a close co-evolution between parasite and host can result in very complex phenotypes. The adaptive manipulation of host behaviour by parasites is a widespread example of this. Here, parasites have evolved the trait to manipulate their host’s brain and change its behavioural output to benefit their own life cycle and transmission. Though for many of these parasite-host interactions the natural history has been well described, we know little about the molecular mechanisms underlying them. My interest lies in elucidating these molecular mechanisms. This will further our understanding of how parasites are able to manipulate the animal brain, how certain behaviours might be regulated and how pathological behaviours might come to be.

Molecular mechanisms of fungal manipulation of ant behaviour

One of the most dramatic examples of parasites changing host behaviour is that of Ophiocordyceps fungi infecting and manipulating ants. Fungal spores infect ants while they forage for food. During the course of infection, the fungus gradually changes the behaviour of its ant host, ultimately making the ant leave the nest to climb up the vegetation where it latches on with its mandibles. This manipulated biting is a completely novel behaviour induced by the fungus and is not part of the regular behaviour as observed in healthy ants. It is also called the “death grip” since manipulated ants will stay in this position where the fungus finally kills them. The parasite then uses the ant’s tissues as a carbon source to grow a fruiting body from between the ant’s thorax and head, which releases infective ascospores for transmission [1,2]. This parasite-host interaction represents a great model system for studies into parasitic manipulation of host behaviour since the manipulation is a) very apparent, b) clearly adaptive to the parasite, and c) reproducible in controlled laboratory infections.
Infection studies combined with behavioural observations and metabolomics analyses of he fungal secretome suggest that the interactions between the fungal parasite and the ant brain that lead to manipulated biting are very species-specific [3]. Moreover, genomics and transcriptomics analyses revealed that Ophiocordyceps unilateralis employs a rather unique set of genes during the manipulated biting event when compared to the genomes of other fungal entomopathogens of the order Hypocreales [4]. These studies have also led to the reporting of the very first candidate genes, compounds and pathways that could be involved in the fungal manipulation of ant behaviour.

Having established these recent advances I am now asking the following research questions:

1. How has the parasitic ability to control the insect brain evolved?
I am using comparative genomics techniques towards answering this question.

2. Which fungal genes are essential to establish behavioural manipulation and what is their function?
I am currently developing the molecular tools to functionally analyse the proposed “manipulator genes”. This work is done in collaboration with the lab of Dr. Andreas Brachmann at the Genetics Section within the Faculty of Biology of the LMU.

3. How could the molecular biological clock be involved in the parasite-host interactions that eventually lead to an altered behavioural output?
I am using experimental chronobiology set ups to elucidate the molecular clock of Ophiocordyceps unilateralis and study the influence of circadian rhythms in infection and manipulation.

http://www.genetik.bio.lmu.de/research/brachmann/index.html

Contact

Institut für Medizinische Psychologie
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Goethestr. 31
80336 München
Deutschland

Phone: +49-89-218075630


Service